As we get closer to the 9th anniversary of 9/11 we are forced to take pause and reflect on the events of the past several months. As well as a certain planned event for Saturday. Being agnostic I clearly see the folly on both sides of this issue. Being a human being of reasonable intelligence I clearly see the wrongness in burning holy text. Not from a religious stand point, but from a humanitarian View Point. The idea is clear Mr. Jones is sending a direct message to Muslims that their religion is not tolerated here. Whatever Jones says he can not hide the intent of burning the Qur’an. He claims that he not speaking to the moderate Muslims, but to those extremists that attacked us on 9/11. That doesn’t fly. By burning their holy text you are speaking to every Muslim. And that is unacceptable. And it is equally unacceptable to provoke violence from those you know can be provoked into violence. While he will enrage the moderate he most likely will not get a violent response. But his words, he is taunting the extremists. And that makes his actions premeditated. And as he has the constitutional right, as a self-proclaimed man of God he has a greater responsibility towards peace and humanity. I do not fear his actions will bring retaliation here. It’s not the solders I fear for, though they will be the most likely targets. It’s the Christian population throughout the middle east. Jordan, Syria, Libya, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, Palestine. These are the ones Terry Jones is willing to put in harm’s way to prove Islamic extremists can be pushed into acts of violence. And those of you who call yourselves American and Christian are willing to step back and allow radical extremists kill innocent people, in order to justify your intolerance of Islam. Terry Jones Responsibilities to the words and teachings of Jesus, should outweigh his constitutional right and his own deep prejudice and intolerance.
Latest Entries »
For some time I have been conceptualizing varying methods of over coming the huge limitations still facing the electric car. As the technology stands it is a great idea for local commuting. And in the Big cities the electric car is more efficient. As the car is not using any energy while stuck in traffic. It’s on the highway that the electric car is woefully inadequate. And lets face it as Americans our love affair with the car was the promise of the open road. The ability to pack up the car and just go on a moments notice. The electric car will get us to work and back and to the grocery store. But it won’t get us very far on the open road without serious down time to recharge all the batteries. And that has always been my goal. To give you the open road. And to do that we need to get completely out of the box and rethink the whole concept of the batteries and energy storage and distribution. And along the way I have come across plenty of nay sayers and skeptics. Most just assume that I am looking for some type of free energy and perpetual motion device. Which is farther from the truth. Fly Wheels store energy, in my system that energy is supplied through work. When the 24v motor spins the flywheel assembly it pushes the magnetic currents through the coils, 12 coils seriesed are ran through an amplifier which increases the amps sufficient to move the car, once the car is moving it only needs 5 amps to maintain. This is not getting energy from nothing. This is using work every step of the way. And by maximizing energy storage and distribution we can jump over one big hurdle.
For a while now I have been planning on converting to an electric car. I got a really good deal on a Probe GT. Now I could just go ahead and buy a conversion kit and put it all together and do what so many before me has done, with the same results. But I could never do that. If I am to take on a big project I have to push the envelope and do something no one has done before. And that was to do something that would in some way advance the technology of the electric car. And I am not an engineer of any sorts. What I am is a person with reasonable skills and intuition. I also believe that if the electric car is to actually dethrone the conventional combustion motor, it’s going to have to come from us. Detroit has too much to lose and not enough to gain. So having nearly two years of complete freedom from Arduous labor, I was able to focus my energies on solving the biggest limitation facing the electric car. Range. The obvious answer to range is more batteries, but there’s a problem, more batteries means more weight and more weight means more drag and more drag means less efficiency. The obvious solution was find a way to charge the batteries while in use. However you can not charge a battery while you’re discharging a battery. The obvious solution to this problem was to divide the battery pack into two separate battery packs. With one pack driving at a time, and this is nothing new people have been putting dual packs in for sometime now. The trick was finding a way to charge the packs while they’re offline. Solar is one option, but a 4ft solar panel will only return about half of the energy spent over the course of an hour. We can also harness kinetic energy and friction, and send that back to the batteries. But here lies another problem, to actually charge the battery, these sources have to produce enough voltage to push past the batteries natural resistance. In the case of a 12v battery you need about 14v to actually push past the resistance. Another inhibiting factor is time. How long does it take to charge the whole bank? To charge the batteries fast would take a lot of amperage. So I had toyed with the idea of running dual high out alternators, one shafted directly to the electric motor, and the other belted to the first. The Idea is to series the alternators together generating 300+ amps. Here’s the puzzler, on the bench it works, just as it logically should. However once all put together, there was too much drag, and too much convergence(energy lost due to heat) that hardly anything made it back to the batteries. So I was back to square one. I had spit in the eye of Thermodynamics, and paid the price. it took me a while to piece it all together, but here’s the problem, it’s the alternators themselves, and how they work. The alternator is made up of key components, the Rotor and the Stator coil. The stator coil is a tightly wound spool of copper wire. The rotor is a strong magnet, that spins inside the stator, creating a magnetic field in the stator, that is then converted to electric current. However, as every magnet has a north and south polarity. This will also create a counter motive force, this is caused by the convergence of the magnetic fields created by both north and south. Since the fields are opposing they attract and counter act each other, which essentially stops the rotor. So how do you overcome the counter motive force and keep the electromagnetic fields stabilized, long enough to charge the batteries. I had to finally admit defeat on this. As I could not see a way around. So far there was no seemingly way to actually charge the batteries while the car was moving, the best I could do was increase the range about 5 miles. But as I was completely and totally dejected and confused, I didn’t give up. It took me several months to break it all down and see where it went wrong. The problem was in the batteries themselves. While the technologies in the motor and the controllers and the electronics in general have grown exponentially, batteries have not. And they pose great environmental hazards, when they have reached the end of their service. So that’s when I decided that the batteries had to go. They cost far too much, they are cumbersome, and add too much weight to the car. They are essentially the Achilles heal of the electric car. What we need is a whole new idea of looking at energy storage. It was in one of those moments when my mind was completely on something completely unrelated, when it hit me. The whole solution to the problem was in the way the magnets and the coils interact. By understanding how the magnetic currents flow and how that flow interacts with the copper windings. So I hit up the ole reliable Youtube, and seen some little home-made projects, but nothing really substantial. Then it dawned on me Ed Leedskalnin had just what I needed. Flywheels. A Flywheel is an energy storage device. And Ed made himself an unbelievable one. It was all in understanding the magnetic flow. On Ed’s flywheel all the magnetic currents pushed into the center where they are channeled through copper plate, where it is converted to electrical current. Which is then drawn off the wheel through electrical wiring. What is strange is that this works because of the geometrical shape Ed formed the copper plating into. I am not quite sure of the significance of the six pointed star in Ed’s flywheel, but who am I to argue with Genius. So with Ed’s concepts I set out to build my own flywheel. I thought I would start small like all those youtube videos. Sorry I do not own a camera of any kind so I can to talk myself through describing the construction of the flywheel. I started with a pair of old CD’s. Mark one CD N. And the Other S. Then draw out the hours of the clock on each CD. Using extremely powerful rare earth bar magnets I paired up 24 for each CD. The Magnets I used for my first prototype had 58ft pounds of Magnetic force. Pairing them gives you 116 per pair. So watch your fingers you don’t want to get pinched pairing them up. Taking the CD marked North. Place the paired magnets on each hour line Going North/south. And similarly South/North on the CD marked S. Once the magnets were secured in their proper place and to their proper polarity, I tool some 1/2 wide copper plating and molded it into the six pointed star pattern that Ed Leedskalnin had used. Then I attached Copper to the CD’s. At this point it looks more like a Tesla Turbine than a flywheel. The Flywheel is mounted Vertically on an axis, within a plastic housing. Then I mounted four two-inch Iron ball bearings, one in each corner of the wheel so to speak. The bearing are mounted to spin on its axes much like Earth spins. The bearings need to be iron, or other composite that can be turned into an electromagnet. As the flywheel spins, its producing 48 non converging magnetic fields that are pushed down into the center of the wheel, there is it forced into the copper plating, converting it to electricity. And at a mere 3000rpm my one little flywheel is putting out 18volts continuous current. Now imagine how much more I’ll get when I series 6 more of these together?
Honor by definition is “That which rightfully attracts esteem, respect, or consideration self-respect dignity courage fidelity especially excellence of character high moral worth; virtue nobleness” As the weekend of “Non Political” rallies wind down in DC this weekend I was left a bit puzzled. First of all Honor isn’t something you can give freely. Honor like respect and trust has to be earned. It’s through your actions and your words that make you honorable or dishonorable. My other concern is regardless if you’re in Beck’s audience or not the fact is he is just a media mouthpiece, and whether or not you agree with the message or not, he is paid to speak the minds of those that fill his coffers. What Glen Beck fails to identify, or maybe he does, and hopes we all see past it, is that to be honorable, you have to be so all the time. And that means the truth. When we distort the truth is a lie. If we spin the truth its a lie. There is no gray area here. And one of the key fundamental problems in this country is we expect our politicians and media mouth pieces to lie to us, then we excuse the lie, or condemn the lie all based on our personal ideologies. To be honorable you must always speak and act on the side of what is right, even if you do not agree, especially if you do not agree. The man who can see past his own prejudices and do right, that is what honor means. To choose only that which agrees with you, even knowing that at the heart of it, you are wrong, well this is dishonor. And that leads me back to the controversy of the mosque near ground zero. While both sides are scrambling daily to come up with new ammunition to hurl at one another I am going to stick to my original argument and beat that dead horse into the ground, as it is the only argument needing to be addressed. And that is beyond everything, is the right of private ownership. The land on which this intended community center will be built on is rightfully owned by American Citizens. And as American Citizens they have the right of ownership. We may not like it but it is right. It is the truth. And the only Honorable thing to do is honor what is right. How many more freedoms and rights must we sacrifice as a whole to sooth the fears and discomforts of a few? By carrying on the fight against the mosque based solely on intolerance and ignorance and distorted facts is by nature the dishonorable thing to do. So just who is Glen Beck restoring honor for? My honor is intact I will always find the right path, and will not be swayed or guided by dishonorable men. Is it for the people? Those loyal listeners that hang on your every word? How can you restore honor for them? This is something they each need to do for themselves. And it begins with the realization that honor can not be achieved through the infliction of other people regardless of the cultural and religious differences. And the whole controversy centering all of this is nothing short of dishonorable. With terms distorting the truth like, Mosque at Ground Zero, 9/11 victory mosque. These are terms meant to sensationalize it and make it news worthy, but they are dishonorable lies. Meant to inflame and call to arms like-minded people. Who by design would be offended by these statements. And in their fear trepidation and intolerance, do not look any deeper into this beyond the inflaming words spread by dishonorable people. My advice to Glen Beck would be to work on restoring your own honor, the rest of us have to worry about ourselves.
In response to some of the hateful email’s I received over my post, “The Self Reliant American” I must have hit a cord with some ultra conservatives. And I usually don’t care what other people say, and well I still don’t care, it just gives me something to blog about. I’ve been called a hippy, an environmentalist, a liberal, etc. Yeah OK whatever I never really identify with a label or a closed off philosophy. I have also been called a leaching worthless determent to society. And that I have to refute, I spent over 22 years contributing to that society. These days, I contribute as little as possible, and take back even less. As I read about 15 comments all so hurtful that I had to remove them, not because of any personal attacks on my character or lifestyle, but for the attacks on whole groups of people who I have been unfairly grouped into. Unfair to me as well as those that do Identify with, the liberals, and the gays, and the Muslims. Thats when it dawned on me. These attacks are motivated by fear. Its fear that drives the debate against the mosque in New York. And do you all really want to set a president, of special interest controlling the rights of land owners? Are you prepared to have a church construction challenged like this? How much more of your freedoms are you going to sacrifice to your fears? How many more wars do we have to endure to appease your fears? And where does this irrational fear of everything come from? It comes from a generations of people raised under the threat of global annihilation by nuclear war. Our leaders pushed an agenda of fear, and we grew up under that blanket of fear, And being fearful makes it so much easier for them to pass laws like the patriot act, and openly spying on Americans on American soil. By instilling fear, and then dividing you against each other, it makes all that much easier for them to control you, and little by little they slowly take more and more of your rights away from you. And by the time you figured it all out, it’s far too late. There is nothing left for you to do but conform. When you break it all down there are really only two kinds of people on this planet. Those that live life, and those that run from it. If you run now, you will be running forever, and then everything you do, say and think will be ruled and controlled by that fear.
President Obama weighed in on the growing controversy over the so-called ground zero mosque. Saying “As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country,” And whether you like it or not he is right. For Christians to be allowed to continue their religious freedoms, those Christians must allow everyone else the right to do the same. I have watched this story closely for some time now and just as with gay rights, there is no reason to oppose this other than simple hate and intolerance. But whats fueling all this hate, racism and intolerance towards Muslims? Especially from a group who claim to be above and beyond this behavior. The biggest source of the hatred and intolerance is being spread by Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. There are so many things wrong in our world today and a lot of that is being reverberated throughout the Idiocracy by these two clowns. There is no real reason why this mosque should not be built where it’s being built. No reasons other than those based on intolerance and racism. If that is not how you see it then tell me where I am wrong. From where I am sitting a movement against this mosque is suing them in order to keep them from building. In other words they are suing to take first amendment rights away from them. That is not only wrong that is UnAmerican. And few are as UnAmerican as Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. As these two have made a living of hiding behind the first amendment you would think they would understand, a true American defends those freedoms unwaveringly. Even if you don’t personally agree. Beck and Limbaugh use and abuse the 1st amendment, and then try to deny to other Americans. Its time that Rush and Glen just packed their bags and left. If we get rid of all the traitor racists and hypocrite religions in this country, the rest of us sensible people will be able to focus on fixing the mess we find ourselves in.
Born in a small village outside Riga Latvia on August 10th 1887. As legend has it Ed was engaged to be married to Agnes Scoff his sweet sixteen. Agnes called off the wedding the day before and soon after Ed left Latvia for the new world. Little is known of Ed’s life in Latvia, we know that his grandfather taught him to be a stone mason. He however winds up in a lumber mill in Canada. It’s here where Ed contracted Tuberculous. As his condition worsened he headed for better climates. We know in 1919 he makes it Florida. He meets a real-estate agent named Moser. Moser and his wife take Ed in and nursed him back to health. Ed claimed he was looking for just the right land. And he would know it when he found it. Moser took Ed around and showed him all the best available farm land, which Ed always rejected. His odd demeanor coupled with the way he would prod the prospected lands led people to speculate Ed was looking for buried treasure. Sometime in early 1922 Ed had found just the right land. To Moser it was the worse possible land in all of Florida. It was solid bedrock of fossilized coral. Ed was insistent and Bought the land for $12 dollars. With in a few weeks Moser and his wife came to check up on Ed and the first signs of Ed’s genius. On a simple chain hoist made of telephone poles, as an immense carved block of Coral, just hanging there perfectly level perfectly calm. And in no time Rock gate is built. If you haven’t seen Coral Castle or heard of Ed Leedskalnin Click here . or click here for the In Search Of episode of Coral Castle. Ed started work in 1922 and finished by 1928. Ed then for reasons only known to Ed, He disassembled Rock Gate and moved it stone by stone, 10 miles away to Homestead, where over the next 3 years he reassembled Rock Gate by 1940. In all the stones at Coral castle weigh a combined 3million pounds. A single wall stone weighs in greater than any single block of the great pyramids. Some of these wall Obelisks weigh over 30 tons. And for all the architectural achievements accomplished by a poor Latvian immigrant with a fourth grade education, is only a fraction of Ed Leedskalnin’s true genius. We may never know exactly how Ed did this all himself. But if we are going to try, we have to start with how Ed built his generator, and why it sounded like music when it ran? On the fly-wheel Ed installed 24 magnets in a six pointed start pattern. this way all poles north and south are pushing outward. If we picture how an alternator works inside maybe you will understand some of Ed’s genius. As the rotor spins inside the stator coil it is producing an electromagnetic field. It is also creating a counter force working against the rotor. So whats happening is the rotor is being stopped completely by this counter force, then restarted and stopped and the process is completely counter productive and highly inefficient. In his one of his pamphlets of magnetic currents Leedskalnin identified this fundamental flaw and a way to correct it. lets picture the rotor as a simple bar magnet, it has a north and south pole. So as the north pole of the magnet is pushed across the copper windings of stator, an electromagnetic field is created. This field is then reversed once the south pole of the magnet passes through the stator on the same path. The result is two equal fields of opposite polarity, and they cancel each other out. Causing the rotor to stop spinning and needing the constant kinetic energy from the crank shaft to keep it spinning. By Leedskalnin’s design all the magnetic fields are generated and pushed outward. In this way no two fields work against each other and no energy is lost in the field convergence. And once the fields were established the generator becomes self-sufficient. But was the added harmonics a byproduct of tampering with a well-balanced harmonic device? Or was it a desired effect? The generator is still on the site, though pieces are missing. I wonder what it would take to get it running again?
I say distant because I don’t follow either faith. But I am not blind to the obvious. So lets talk about this planned Islamic Mega Mosque being planned at ground zero. Pushing the opposition is self-described conservative blogger Pamela Geller. When I first started looking into this I thought it was a joke. But alas it is true. A group called Cordoba is planning the project as I write. Well lets clear up two misconceptions, One the mega mosque will be a community center, more than mosque, and two it’s not being built at ground zero, its being built 2 blocks away, given the average New York city block is about 264 feet, the mosque will be about 528 feet, so whats the serious problem here? I thought I would catch up with the other side and find out what their objections were? I started at the primary source Pamela Geller’s blog. Look I tried to make some sense out of this from both vantage points and it is clear, in her own words Pamela Geller simply does not like Muslims. Here’s the thing, Miss Geller by her own admission after 9/11 began to immerse herself to gain full understanding, of Islam, Jihad, and terror. Here lies the whole problem, Miss Geller never set out to learn about Islam, she set out to destroy it. let me give you a little tip, when a person opens an argument with the statement I’m not racist, a very racist comment will always follow. The proof is evident, Miss Geller, and all those people who spoke out against this mosque spoke out in hatred and intolerance. How many times have we heard the argument, Christians could never get away with something like this in Muslim Countries? While it is for the most part a true statement, let me just say this. This is not one of those Countries, this is America, We are not a Christian Nation, we are a nation of Religious Freedom. The constitution guarantee’s that religious freedom. And to deny that Religious freedom to anyone, and in the next breath have audacity to call the President a Socialist. Well if Obama is a socialist, I would rather live under his kind of socialism, that Pamela’s Geller’s Brand of Nazism. What’s next Pam Japanese style internment camps for all non Christians? But the problem doesn’t lie with Pam Geller alone. A great many conservative Christians can not hide their open seething hatred for all Muslims, and this is kinda funny, and here’s why. The conservative will always resort to pointing out the evils of Islam, meaning the 3% of the extremists who actually do what to kill Americans. And here’s the punchline, Those conservatives, like Pam Geller are in that same 3% . My favorite argument against this Mosque and Muslims in general is the fear of them converting Christian children. Are you kidding me? Every organized Christian Church has its own missionaries, actively seeking out and converting anyone they can. So what if you lose a few to Islam, at the end of the day what should it matter to anyone, where anyone of any faith builds their churches and community center? Seems to me the only thing this center is provoking is Miss Geller’s personal prejudice, and Intolerance.
I try to stay out of these religious basis conversations, however recent articles and conversations has led me back to the keyboard. The question is why does faith always lead to intolerance? before I start blasting on faith let me explain my position, I am not an Atheist, an Atheist must know more that I do. However I will not accept a book, collection of oral histories from many different cultures over a vast period of time, as being the one true word of God. While I don’t label myself as Faithful, I do believe in a designed order of the universe. And no you are not the center of it. So I have to ask myself why do those of faith show so much intolerance? Just the other day as I was scanning through a faith-based story on the internet, I also scan the comments. One comment in particular caught my attention, the poster was crying foul over all the “Atheists” judging Christians, the christian then cites the bible on passing judgment. Typical Christian response. The Christian then closes with all non believers will burn, etc. Hmmm, he displays anger at being judged, then closes by passing judgment. The hypocrisy of faith is immeasurable and the damage it has caused is irreparable. It was faith in God that lead Jim Jones and his followers into mass suicide. It was faith in God that drove David Koresh and his branch Davidian suicide. The faith in God was behind every lynching, in this country. Faith of God rests in every war and atrocity the U.S. has ever committed. Faith in God drives the greed and power of the corrupt church. Faith in God drives Fred Phelps to protest funerals of fallen soldiers. Faith in God gives Phelps the right to spread hate and intolerance. Faith of God drives men like Phelps to slander God. Faith in God feeds hate intolerance and exclusion. Faith in God leads us to only more pain, more sorrow and more greed. A world with out God is a world closer together.
The other day I found myself in a conversation with a few friends. CNN had just ran its hourly quota of gulf news coverage. That coverage sparked a debate amongst us about environmental disasters, which ultimately ran into climate change. I’ll call my friends Steve and Rick. Both are moderately conservative and both moderately religious. I only say that because even their moderate religious beliefs play an instrumental role in their political, social and environmental views. Steve begins the debate by saying that crude is just a necessary evil we have to contend with in order to maintain our way of life. Now this is a big deal, wars have been fought, just to maintain ‘Way of Life’ Steve then goes on to ask of us, “Do we just throw away 50 years of technology simply because some scientists say what we’re doing is wrong?” And Steve’s point is that not all environmental scientists agree with man-made climate change. And as Steve pointed out, that just the Iceland’s Eyjafjoell volcano is emitting more co2 daily than all the S UV’s in the world. And that is true. It is also true that the oceans contain over 34,000 gigatonnes of carbon. On top of the 2,000 3,000gts of co2 in the biomass. So with humans contributing a paltry 26gt. This opens it up for Rick to jump in. No surprise to me that Rick backs up Steve with another interesting fact. Global Warming is happening all over the solar system. So that would imply the sun has more to do with our climate change than anything we do. And again I can’t argue that. Its true the sun goes through 11-15 year cycles called solar maximum, and most likely a great contributor to Climate Change. SO now it was my turn. I first addressed Steve’s misinformed information about the need for oil. There are no such things as necessary evils. And we do not need crude oil for anything at all. The more than 25,000 products made from crude, can be made just as easy and a lot cheaper from hemp. The reason it isn’t is a matter of simple greed. And the Oil lobbyists makes sure the moral compass in America points away from hemp. Now for the front line assault. While I have to concede that their points are valid, they really didn’t think their argument out so well. Lets accept that Eyjafjoell does emit more co2 daily than all the S UV’s that still doesn’t account for the other 300 million vehicles on the road. And as far as the vast amounts of CO2 released by nature as compared by man. Remember the natural cycles of release and absorptions are regulating by nature. Yes there are periods where the earth releasing more co2 than it can absorb, however those always follow periods of light release and the rate of absorption is able to regulate the CO2 levels.When we add to that, we are heavily contributing to the imbalance. And we continue to do this right through each Solar Maximum. So each period of natural imbalance is being further imbalanced by our actions. Which is why the co2 is at levels not seen in 800,000 years. While on the surface it may not seem like we are contributing all that much, what we are contributing is upsetting the balance. Why can’t we make the switch back to hemp based products and fuels? The answer came to me from another friend in a completely different conversation. People can no longer tell the difference between actual needs and instant gratification.